The Rule of 40 is Dead
PROJECT CASE STUDIES
Is the Rule of 40 still relevant in an AI-driven world, or are new economics redefining how we measure growth, profitability, and true competitive advantage?
A Unity of Opposites: New Housing Models That Align Owners and Residents
MARKET RESEARCH
Housing works best when landlords and tenants share incentives. Emerging models are redesigning the relationship to create stability, fairness, and long-term value for both sides.
More Units Isn’t Enough: Densifying Housing Also Requires Building Communities
EMERGING TRENDS
Building more housing units alone won’t create livable cities. Without schools, transit, parks, community space, and affordability planned in tandem, density risks producing strain instead of thriving neighbourhoods.
The Chemistry Works. Now Comes the Hard Part.
The next materials revolution in housing will depend less on chemistry and more on which companies can survive long enough to change how we build.
The Great American Housing Shortage Is Finally Forcing a Search for Solutions
The WSJ piece highlights why the housing shortage cannot be solved by demand-side fixes alone, reinforcing the need for innovation across zoning, financing, modular construction, and home delivery.
The Rule of 40 Is Dead
Is the Rule of 40 still relevant in an AI-driven world, or are new economics redefining how we measure growth, profitability, and true competitive advantage?
A Unity of Opposites: New Housing Models That Align Owners and Residents
Housing works best when landlords and tenants share incentives. Emerging models are redesigning the relationship to create stability, fairness, and long-term value for both sides.
More Units Isn’t Enough: Densifying Housing Also Requires Building Communities
Building more housing units alone won’t create livable cities. Without schools, transit, parks, community space, and affordability planned in tandem, density risks producing strain instead of thriving neighbourhoods.
Build Like LEGO: Is Construction Ready to Innovate Boldly?
LEGO’s smart bricks show how backward compatible innovation can inspire builders, reminding construction that play, experimentation, and invisible technology may be the key to unlocking its future.
Creating Conditions for Success – Now you see it, now you don’t?
Early Build Canada Homes proposed $1 billion in equity financing for prefab builders, but its quiet removal now raises doubts about whether capital to scale modern construction will materialize at all.
Trump's Housing Ban: Let’s take a closer look
Trump’s proposed ban on institutional homebuyers highlights real affordability pressures, but lasting relief hinges on solving America’s housing supply shortage, not just reshuffling who gets to buy.
Our New Year’s Resolutions: Where AI Meets the Real Economy
AI is clearly having its moment, but the real test for housing and construction investors is whether it makes homes faster to build, safer to finance, and better to live in, not how impressive it looks in a demo.
Venture Capital is Swinging back to Hardware
Venture capital is undergoing a quiet transformation. After a decade dominated by software, the momentum is shifting toward hardware, infrastructure, and the physical systems that power intelligence. Canada risks being left behind if investors don’t adapt.
If we don’t reinvent housing, a certain someone else (cough…Elon…cough) probably will
Housing hasn’t evolved — but disruption is coming. If Canada doesn’t reinvent how we build, Elon Musk or Big Tech will. Build faster. Smarter. Or get left behind, again.
Build Canada Homes: What We Know Today and the Opportunity Ahead
Nothing looms larger than the housing crisis, and nothing Canada’s tried so far has been big enough to fix it. Enter Build Canada Homes—Ottawa’s most ambitious swing yet at solving affordability.
Homebuilding in 2025 still powered by 1890’s Playbook?
Housing is scarce not because people stopped wanting homes, but because construction insists each one is a bespoke masterpiece. The good news? Automation and new tech are finally giving the industry its long-awaited glow-up.
NASA vs SpaceX : The False Dichotomy of Innovation
Nothing spurs clicks like a good fight - who did it better? The answer in this case is - both. What’s more important is that the question completely misses the point.